Get Involved
How to Verify Information Before You Share It
A practical checklist for evaluating claims about a sensitive legal case, so that the information you share is accurate, responsible, and trustworthy.
In a fast-moving situation, inaccurate claims can spread quickly, and once it is shared, they are hard to take back. If you want to help, the single most useful habit is to verify before you share. This checklist explains how.
1. Find the original source
Trace a claim back to where it started. A screenshot of a screenshot is not a source. Look for the original report, document, or statement, and ask who produced it and when.
2. Prefer primary and established sources
Weight information from primary documents and well-established human-rights organisations more heavily than anonymous or unverifiable posts. Established organisations have reputations to protect and correction processes when they get things wrong.
3. Separate fact from allegation
A responsible summary distinguishes clearly between:
- Verified facts: supported by reliable, checkable sources
- Allegations and claims: reported, but not confirmed
- Opinion and analysis: interpretation, clearly labelled as such
Keeping these categories separate protects both your credibility and the people involved.
4. Watch the emotional temperature
Content engineered to make you angry or afraid is often the least reliable. Strong emotion is exactly what pushes people to share before checking. Pause when a claim feels designed to provoke.
5. Check the date and context
Old images and statements are frequently recycled and presented as new. Confirm when something happened and whether the context has been preserved or stripped away.
6. When in doubt, don't
If you cannot verify a claim, the responsible choice is simple: do not share it. Silence is better than amplifying something false. You can always share the verified version once it is confirmed.
A quick pre-share checklist
- Can I identify the original source?
- Is it from a primary document or an established organisation?
- Am I clear on what is fact versus allegation?
- Is the date and context intact?
- Would I stand behind this if it were quoted back to me?
The bottom line
Careful sharing is a form of advocacy in itself. By holding the line on accuracy, you help keep the wider conversation honest, and you protect the credibility that any campaign depends on.
References
- Widely used media-literacy and fact-checking frameworks.
- Responsible-reporting guidance from human-rights and journalism bodies.
Following these steps keeps the campaign trustworthy. Verified resources and organisations are listed on the Resources page.
Related articles
How to Support a Human-Rights Campaign Responsibly
Practical, peaceful and accurate ways to support a human-rights campaign without spreading misinformation or putting anyone at risk.
Read articleVerified Facts, Reported Claims, and Campaign Positions
How to keep verified facts, reported claims and campaign positions separate, with a simple test to run before you share anything.
Read articleFair-Trial Guarantees That Protect Everyone
The specific fair-trial guarantees written into international law, why they apply to everyone, and the red flags human-rights observers watch for.
Read article